In Manchester United's defeat of Brighton, the Red Devils got the winning penalty after the final whistle, which caused a lot of controversy. ESPN reporter Dell Johnson specially posted the relevant rules of the FA’s VAR implementation manual after the game, stating that Manchester United’s penalty for additional penalty kicks is completely correct in terms of rules. However, the "Mirror" holds a different view on this. They believe that Manchester United is taking advantage and taking advantage of the rules.
在曼联队击败布莱顿队的比赛中，红魔队在最后的哨声之后获欧巴体育得了点球大战，这引起了很多争议。 ESPN记者戴尔·约翰逊（Dell Johnson）在赛后特别发布了足协VAR实施手册的相关规则，指欧巴体育官方网站出曼联对附加罚球的罚款在规则方面是完全正确的。但是，“镜子”对此持不同观点。他们认为曼联正在利用并利用规则。
The Mirror dared to say this because they found the previous question and answer from Neil Swabrick, the head of VAR in the Premier League, and believed that Manchester United’s penalty for this campaign did not meet the rules previously expressed by the referee. In an interview, Neil Svabrick once publicly talked about the referee's handling of a dispute involving VAR at the end of the game.
《镜报》之所以敢于这样说，是因为他们找到了英超VAR负责人尼尔·斯瓦布里克（Neil Swabrick）的上一个欧巴体育官方网站问题和答案，并认为曼联对这项运动的处罚不符合裁判员先前表达的规则。在采访中，尼尔·斯瓦布里克（Neil Svabrick）曾经公开谈论过裁判在比赛结束时处理涉及VAR的争议。
At that time, someone asked if there was an accident at the end of the game, but the referee did not find out, VAR is reviewing, what will happen when the final whistle blows? Neil Swabrick said at the time: "We have a corresponding procedure to deal with this. When an incident is being reviewed, the VAR will first inform the referee that the review is underway, and the referee will blow a whistle to suspend the game. The referee will put the finger on his left hand. On the ears, then stretch out the palm of your hand to convey information to everyone. VAR is checking their decision. Everyone on the field has to stop. After the review is completed, VAR will give feedback. Then the referee can blow the half-time whistle or Final whistle. If VAR recommends a decision, the referee will give instructions, the screen will show the event, and then the decision will be made."
那时，有人问比赛结束时是否有事故，但裁判没有发现，VAR正在审查，当最后的哨声响起时会发生什么？ Neil Swabrick当时说：“我们有相应的程序来处理此问题。在对事件进行复审时，VAR将首先通知裁判员正在进行复审，裁判员将鸣笛以暂停比赛。裁判将手指放在左手上，放在耳朵上，然后伸出手掌向所有人传达信息。VAR正在检查他们的决定。场上的每个人都必须停下来。将给出反馈。然后裁判可以吹响半场哨声或终场哨声。如果VAR建议做欧巴体育官方网站出决定，则裁判将给出指示，屏幕将显示事件，然后做出决定。”
At that time, Swablick also specifically mentioned that a similar incident occurred in the Bundesliga in the 17/18 season, Mainz vs. Freiburg. The referee originally blew the whistle at the end of the half-time, but under the reminder of the VAR referee, the referee awarded a penalty kick. The players on both sides returned to the court and Mainz took the lead with the penalty kick.
The interview with Svabrick dug up by the "Mirror" indicated that Manchester United benefited from the penalty because the referee on duty of the game tonight did not follow the standard procedure that Svabrick said, and finally gave Manchester United has a penalty kick. In the final analysis, there is a lot of flexibility in some of the VAR judgment criteria, and rules can be found to support the judgment. Many rules are still a bit vague. Sometimes the judgment depends entirely on the personal will of the head referee. This is also the frequent controversy of VAR The reason lies.